Serveur d'exploration sur Mozart

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Behavior as a social construction

Identifieur interne : 000013 ( PascalFrancis/Curation ); précédent : 000012; suivant : 000014

Behavior as a social construction

Auteurs : Charles P. Shimp [États-Unis]

Source :

RBID : Pascal:01-0438942

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Behavior analysis is examined from a social constructionist perspective. Constructionism is first defined and contrasted with a generic positivistic image of science. Behavior analysis, especially the matching law, is then viewed from both perspectives. The actual practice of behavior analysis (as opposed to the philosophy of radical behaviorism) more strongly resembles positivist than constructionist views. This alignment between behavior analysis and positivism emerges more sharply when positivist and constructionist perspectives are compared on the relation between science and music. Charles Rosen has identified how the classical style of musical composition and performance depended on 18th century keyboard technology, and a constructionist view sees the matching law as reflecting mid 20th century technology and culture in much the same way as it sees, say Mozart's 23rd piano concerto, as reflecting late 18th century culture. Behavior analysts, who often behave as though they see the matching law as an objective, impersonal, stable, hard, cold, incontrovertibly true fact, appear more inclined than constructionists to see a fundamental difference between the matching law and Mozart's 23rd piano concerto, to which they would attribute few if any of these characteristics. Possible implications are derived for tolerance in science.
pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0376-6357
A02 01      @0 BPRODA
A03   1    @0 Behav. processes
A05       @2 54
A06       @2 1-3
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Behavior as a social construction
A09 01  1  ENG  @1 The Longer View: 20th Century Quantitative Analysis of Behavior
A11 01  1    @1 SHIMP (Charles P.)
A12 01  1    @1 KILLEEN (Peter R.) @9 ed.
A12 02  1    @1 MACHADO (Armando) @9 ed.
A14 01      @1 Room 502, Department of Psychology, University of Utah, 380 S. 1530 E. @2 Salt Lake City, Utah 84112-0251 @3 USA @Z 1 aut.
A15 01      @1 Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Box 1104 @2 Tempe, AZ 85287-1104 @3 USA @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut.
A18 01  1    @1 Society for the Quantitative Analysis of Behavior @3 INC @9 patr.
A20       @1 11-32
A21       @1 2001
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 17558 @5 354000095412030020
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2001 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 1 p.3/4
A47 01  1    @0 01-0438942
A60       @1 P @2 C
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Behavioural processes
A66 01      @0 IRL
C01 01    ENG  @0 Behavior analysis is examined from a social constructionist perspective. Constructionism is first defined and contrasted with a generic positivistic image of science. Behavior analysis, especially the matching law, is then viewed from both perspectives. The actual practice of behavior analysis (as opposed to the philosophy of radical behaviorism) more strongly resembles positivist than constructionist views. This alignment between behavior analysis and positivism emerges more sharply when positivist and constructionist perspectives are compared on the relation between science and music. Charles Rosen has identified how the classical style of musical composition and performance depended on 18th century keyboard technology, and a constructionist view sees the matching law as reflecting mid 20th century technology and culture in much the same way as it sees, say Mozart's 23rd piano concerto, as reflecting late 18th century culture. Behavior analysts, who often behave as though they see the matching law as an objective, impersonal, stable, hard, cold, incontrovertibly true fact, appear more inclined than constructionists to see a fundamental difference between the matching law and Mozart's 23rd piano concerto, to which they would attribute few if any of these characteristics. Possible implications are derived for tolerance in science.
C02 01  X    @0 002A26A
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Théorie @5 01
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Theory @5 01
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Teoría @5 01
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Comportement @5 02
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Behavior @5 02
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Conducta @5 02
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Musique @5 03
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Music @5 03
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Música @5 03
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Méthode étude @5 04
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Investigation method @5 04
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Método estudio @5 04
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Renforcement @5 05
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 Reinforcement @5 05
C03 05  X  SPA  @0 Reforzamiento @5 05
C03 06  X  FRE  @0 Prise décision @5 06
C03 06  X  ENG  @0 Decision making @5 06
C03 06  X  SPA  @0 Toma decision @5 06
C03 07  X  FRE  @0 Contexte @5 07
C03 07  X  ENG  @0 Context @5 07
C03 07  X  SPA  @0 Contexto @5 07
C03 08  X  FRE  @0 Société @5 08
C03 08  X  ENG  @0 Society @5 08
C03 08  X  SPA  @0 Sociedad @5 08
C03 09  X  FRE  @0 Psychologie cognitive @5 57
C03 09  X  ENG  @0 Cognitive psychology @5 57
C03 09  X  SPA  @0 Psichología cognitiva @5 57
C03 10  X  FRE  @0 Positivisme @4 INC @5 78
C07 01  X  FRE  @0 Méthodologie @5 29
C07 01  X  ENG  @0 Methodology @5 29
C07 01  X  SPA  @0 Metodología @5 29
C07 02  X  FRE  @0 Cognition @5 35
C07 02  X  ENG  @0 Cognition @5 35
C07 02  X  SPA  @0 Cognición @5 35
N21       @1 309
pR  
A30 01  1  ENG  @1 Meeting of the Society for the Quantitative Analysis of Behavior (SQAB 2000) @3 Washington, DC USA @4 2000-05-26

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

Pascal:01-0438942

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Behavior as a social construction</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Shimp, Charles P" sort="Shimp, Charles P" uniqKey="Shimp C" first="Charles P." last="Shimp">Charles P. Shimp</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Room 502, Department of Psychology, University of Utah, 380 S. 1530 E.</s1>
<s2>Salt Lake City, Utah 84112-0251</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">01-0438942</idno>
<date when="2001">2001</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 01-0438942 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:01-0438942</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000223</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000013</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Behavior as a social construction</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Shimp, Charles P" sort="Shimp, Charles P" uniqKey="Shimp C" first="Charles P." last="Shimp">Charles P. Shimp</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Room 502, Department of Psychology, University of Utah, 380 S. 1530 E.</s1>
<s2>Salt Lake City, Utah 84112-0251</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Behavioural processes</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Behav. processes</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0376-6357</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2001">2001</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Behavioural processes</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Behav. processes</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0376-6357</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Behavior</term>
<term>Cognitive psychology</term>
<term>Context</term>
<term>Decision making</term>
<term>Investigation method</term>
<term>Music</term>
<term>Reinforcement</term>
<term>Society</term>
<term>Theory</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Théorie</term>
<term>Comportement</term>
<term>Musique</term>
<term>Méthode étude</term>
<term>Renforcement</term>
<term>Prise décision</term>
<term>Contexte</term>
<term>Société</term>
<term>Psychologie cognitive</term>
<term>Positivisme</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Musique</term>
<term>Société</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Behavior analysis is examined from a social constructionist perspective. Constructionism is first defined and contrasted with a generic positivistic image of science. Behavior analysis, especially the matching law, is then viewed from both perspectives. The actual practice of behavior analysis (as opposed to the philosophy of radical behaviorism) more strongly resembles positivist than constructionist views. This alignment between behavior analysis and positivism emerges more sharply when positivist and constructionist perspectives are compared on the relation between science and music. Charles Rosen has identified how the classical style of musical composition and performance depended on 18th century keyboard technology, and a constructionist view sees the matching law as reflecting mid 20th century technology and culture in much the same way as it sees, say Mozart's 23rd piano concerto, as reflecting late 18th century culture. Behavior analysts, who often behave as though they see the matching law as an objective, impersonal, stable, hard, cold, incontrovertibly true fact, appear more inclined than constructionists to see a fundamental difference between the matching law and Mozart's 23rd piano concerto, to which they would attribute few if any of these characteristics. Possible implications are derived for tolerance in science.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0376-6357</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01">
<s0>BPRODA</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>Behav. processes</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>54</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>1-3</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Behavior as a social construction</s1>
</fA08>
<fA09 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>The Longer View: 20th Century Quantitative Analysis of Behavior</s1>
</fA09>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>SHIMP (Charles P.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA12 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>KILLEEN (Peter R.)</s1>
<s9>ed.</s9>
</fA12>
<fA12 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>MACHADO (Armando)</s1>
<s9>ed.</s9>
</fA12>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Room 502, Department of Psychology, University of Utah, 380 S. 1530 E.</s1>
<s2>Salt Lake City, Utah 84112-0251</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA15 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Box 1104</s1>
<s2>Tempe, AZ 85287-1104</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA15>
<fA18 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>Society for the Quantitative Analysis of Behavior</s1>
<s3>INC</s3>
<s9>patr.</s9>
</fA18>
<fA20>
<s1>11-32</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2001</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>17558</s2>
<s5>354000095412030020</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2001 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>1 p.3/4</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>01-0438942</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
<s2>C</s2>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Behavioural processes</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>IRL</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>Behavior analysis is examined from a social constructionist perspective. Constructionism is first defined and contrasted with a generic positivistic image of science. Behavior analysis, especially the matching law, is then viewed from both perspectives. The actual practice of behavior analysis (as opposed to the philosophy of radical behaviorism) more strongly resembles positivist than constructionist views. This alignment between behavior analysis and positivism emerges more sharply when positivist and constructionist perspectives are compared on the relation between science and music. Charles Rosen has identified how the classical style of musical composition and performance depended on 18th century keyboard technology, and a constructionist view sees the matching law as reflecting mid 20th century technology and culture in much the same way as it sees, say Mozart's 23rd piano concerto, as reflecting late 18th century culture. Behavior analysts, who often behave as though they see the matching law as an objective, impersonal, stable, hard, cold, incontrovertibly true fact, appear more inclined than constructionists to see a fundamental difference between the matching law and Mozart's 23rd piano concerto, to which they would attribute few if any of these characteristics. Possible implications are derived for tolerance in science.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>002A26A</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Théorie</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Theory</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Teoría</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Comportement</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Behavior</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Conducta</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Musique</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Music</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Música</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Méthode étude</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Investigation method</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Método estudio</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Renforcement</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Reinforcement</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Reforzamiento</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Prise décision</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Decision making</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Toma decision</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Contexte</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Context</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Contexto</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Société</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Society</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Sociedad</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Psychologie cognitive</s0>
<s5>57</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Cognitive psychology</s0>
<s5>57</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Psichología cognitiva</s0>
<s5>57</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Positivisme</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>78</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Méthodologie</s0>
<s5>29</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Methodology</s0>
<s5>29</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Metodología</s0>
<s5>29</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>35</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>35</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Cognición</s0>
<s5>35</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21>
<s1>309</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
<pR>
<fA30 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Meeting of the Society for the Quantitative Analysis of Behavior (SQAB 2000)</s1>
<s3>Washington, DC USA</s3>
<s4>2000-05-26</s4>
</fA30>
</pR>
</standard>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/MozartV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000013 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000013 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Musique
   |area=    MozartV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:01-0438942
   |texte=   Behavior as a social construction
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.20.
Data generation: Sun Apr 10 15:06:14 2016. Site generation: Tue Feb 7 15:40:35 2023